home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT1483>
- <link 93TO0120>
- <title>
- Apr. 19, 1993: City Hall Free-For-All
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Apr. 19, 1993 Los Angeles
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- LOS ANGELES, Page 31
- City Hall Free-For-All
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By JACK E. WHITE--With reporting by Jeanne McDowell/Los
- Angeles
- </p>
- <p> Los Angeles voters had hoped the current mayoral race
- would feature a searching debate about the city's direction in
- the post-Tom Bradley era. What they got was the political
- equivalent of a freeway pileup. Even though 28 candidates have
- pulled out of the race, the names of 24 more still clutter the
- ballot for the April 20 election. "There are too many choices,
- too many options," says voter Stephanie Mancillas, a
- grammar-school instructional aide, echoing the widespread
- perplexity. "It's like when you take a child to the candy store
- and tell him there are hundreds of pieces to choose from. He
- can't."
- </p>
- <p> Even worse, the campaign has shed little light on how Los
- Angeles can cope with its lagging economy, rising crime and deep
- racial divisions. The size of the field has muffled debate on
- the issues. The strongest candidates are not even trying to
- finish first in what everyone assumes will be merely an initial
- round of voting, with no one likely to get a majority. All are
- angling for just enough support to get into the two-person
- runoff election on June 8. Since the vote will be split among
- so many, a contender could do that by getting as little as 15%
- of the ballots next week. To that end, the mayoral hopefuls are
- playing it safe, narrowcasting their messages to voter segments
- where they are already popular rather than making broad appeals
- to the entire electorate. Their caution makes political sense,
- but it has left voters thirsting for inspiration.
- </p>
- <p> The leader in recent polls is Democratic city council
- member Michael Woo, a 41-year-old Chinese American who would be
- the city's first mayor of Asian descent. By campaigning as a
- conciliator, Woo seeks to inherit the coalition of minorities
- and liberals that supported Bradley. Says he: "I want to be the
- mayor who unites the city," the one "closing the gap between the
- haves and have-nots." His critics fault Woo for being too soft
- on crime.
- </p>
- <p> His closest rival, who is gaining fast, is Republican
- Richard Riordan, 62, an attorney and investment banker who
- presents himself as a Ross Perot-style outsider "tough enough
- to turn L.A. around." Riordan has already spent $3 million of
- his own money to spread his message that he would put more cops
- on the street and open more city government functions to bidding
- by private enterprise. But while Riordan has gained strong
- support from conservative whites in the San Fernando Valley, he
- has almost no name identification among minorities. And the
- little they know about him, they might not like. Last week a
- Dallas (Texas) Morning News story described an alleged
- conversation between Riordan and a woman in wealthy Bel-Air.
- According to the newspaper, when the woman remarked, "Black
- people are just awful--don't you think so?" Riordan replied,
- "Some of them." He insists he does not recall saying it.
- </p>
- <p> At this point, neither Woo nor Riordan has an absolute
- lock on making the runoff. They could lose to either of two
- experienced city council members, Nate Holden and Joel Wachs,
- or to Assemblyman Richard Katz, whose campaign is being run by
- James Carville. Whatever the outcome, the campaign has been a
- disappointment for voters who yearn for a more edifying
- exploration of new ideas. They can only hope that the quality
- of the debate will improve after the field is reduced in next
- week's voting.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-